IMPOLITENESS IN TV SERIES EUPHORIA: A GENDER-BASED SOCIOPRAGMATIC ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47701/frasa.v6i2.5039Keywords:
Impoliteness strategies, Gender and language, Sociopragmatics analysisAbstract
Impoliteness in language reflects complex social dynamics, especially in audiovisual media where characters perform identity, power, and gender roles through dialogue. However, few studies have explored how gender-based impoliteness unfolds in fictional narratives, creating a gap between theory and media representations. This study investigates impoliteness strategies and gendered linguistic features in Season 1 of the TV series Euphoria. Using a qualitative descriptive method, the study analyzes 50 impolite utterances through Culpeper’s (2011) framework of impoliteness and gender theories from Lakoff (1973) and Coates (2013). Findings show that both male and female characters most frequently use the Bald on Record strategy, but female characters employ impoliteness more often. Taboo words emerge as the dominant linguistic feature across genders, with higher intensity among females. These results challenge conventional views of women as more polite or indirect speakers. In Euphoria, female characters use language typically associated with masculine speech, aggressive, explicit, and confrontational, indicating a shift in gendered communication patterns. This research highlights the urgency of viewing fictional media as a sociopragmatic lens to understand how language, gender, and power interact. It offers new insight into how media narratives can subvert traditional gender norms and reflect evolving linguistic behaviors.
Downloads
References
Adnyani, K. E. K. (2014). Bahasa sebagai objek kajian gender. Prasi, 9(18).
Ambarita, R., Nasution, K., Mulyadi, M., & Pujiono, Mhd. (2023). Linguistics Features of Impoliteness Language in Political Comments on Social Media (pp. 165–173). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-144-9_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-144-9_19
Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Gumperz, J. J. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=db6tAQAAQBAJ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Coates, J. (2013). Gender and discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 90–103). Routledge.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=tKeHic50MP4C DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and Gender. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=jBzJhxxGEaAC DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139245883
Ghayedi Karimi, M., Jalilifar, A., & Bagheri, M. S. (2022). “You Sick Geeky Bastards!”: A Gender-Based Analysis of Impoliteness Strategies in American Comedy Series. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 14(1), 1–18.
Ginarti, D., Nurhapitudin, I., Ruminda, R., & Iksan, H. H. (2022). Study of language features used by male and female in# SaveJohnnyDepp on Instagram and Twitter. Az-Zahra: Journal of Gender and Family Studies, 2(2), 127–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/azzahra.v2i2.14388
Hanif, A. (2021). Penggunaan Strategi Ketidaksantunan Julukan Tak Pantas Dalam Siniar Deddy Corbuzier. Mahakarya: Jurnal Mahasiswa Ilmu Budaya, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.22515/mjmib.v2i1.3866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/mjmib.v2i1.3866
Hardiasari, S. A. P., Sagita, Y., Fadhila, N., Sulistyawati, T. G., Utomo, A. P. Y., Neina, Q. A., & Kesuma, R. G. (2024). Implikatur percakapan dalam film “Hati Suhita” adaptasi novel karya Khilma Anis. Student Scientific Creativity Journal, 2(5), 26–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/sscj-amik.v2i5.3962
Helnisza, V., Revita, I., & Aslinda, A. (2024). Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa dalam Webtoon “The Secret Of Angel (True Beauty)”: Kajian Psikopragmatik. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 12(3), 471. https://doi.org/10.24036/jbs.v12i3.130354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jbs.v12i3.130354
Holmes, J. (2013). Women, men and politeness. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315845722
Hurlock, E. B. (1997). Psikologi perkembangan: suatu pendekatan sepanjang rentang kehidupan.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman’s place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif/penulis. Prof. DR. Lexy J. Moleong, MA PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 410.
Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Gibbons, P. (2001). Empirical support for the gender-as-culture hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female language differences. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 121–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/27.1.121
Nugraha, D. N. S. (2022). Diferensiasi Linguistik Berdasarkan Gender Pada Podcast “Conan O’Brien Needs A Friend” Dalam Kajian Sosiolingistik. Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.35313/jbit.v8i1.3701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35313/jbit.v8i1.3701
Rianto, P. (2020). When Lying Becomes an Ordinary Thing: Communication Ethics in the Post-Truth Era. Indonesia Communication Journal, 9(1), 57–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v9i1.11986
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Meira Duhita, Mangatur Nababan, Djatmika Djatmika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.































