ONLINE DISCUSSION STRATRGIES TO FACILITATE STUDENTS DISCUSSION FOR A SPECIFIC ACADEMIC PURPOSES COURSE AT A TECHNICAL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47701/frasa.v3i2.2309Abstract
At higher education institutions, hybrid learning that incorporates digital classroom and online teaching and learning activities are becoming increasingly popular norms. Throughout the academia, the usage of online discussion forums is progressively making its way into language classroom as studies have shown that it contributes to a good learning environment if efficiently used by both learners and educators. This qualitative study investigated strategies used by undergraduates as purposive samples in planning and executing ideas for a project via online discussion mode. This simple case study involved 15 second semester undergraduates taking “Professional English 1†course in Bachelor in Engineering Technology program. A focus group interview and follow-up individual interviews were used to elicit information from the undergraduates. All these were also triangulated with document analysis of their reflective notes and drafts of writing works. Several questions were asked to the undergraduates during both interviews to determine their strategies when discussing online. The findings indicate that participants have tremendously benefited from online discussions and have employed three main strategies namely 1) asking for clarification, 2) going over previous responses and 3) using free online services and websites. This study provides useful insight and increases awareness among lecturers on the online discussion strategies used by students, allowing for more successful and meaningful planning of tasks involving online discussion.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, N., Rahim, ISA., & Ahmad, S. (2021). Designing effective online assessment implementation strategies for tertiary language courses-narratives on preliminary overview of challenges. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021.
Ahmad, N. & Mohd Said, M. K. (2013). Synergizing hard skills and soft skills training collaboration in enhancing industrial training experiences: Narratives of a technical engineering university. Synergy 1, TeSSHI. Chapters on Humanities and Social Sciences.Vol 1., 52-68, UiTM Kedah Press
Ahmad, N., Ab Rahim, I. S., and Ahmad, S. (2021). Challenges in implementing online language assessment-A critical reflection of issues faced amidst Covid-19 pandemic. Knowledge Management International Conference (KMICe) Proceedings, 2021, http://www.kmice.cms.net.my
Al-shalchi, O. N. (2009). The effectiveness and development of online discussions. MERLOT Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 104–108.
An, H., Shin, S., & Lim, K. (2009). The effects of different instructor facilitation approaches on students’ interactions during asynchronous online discussions. Computers and Education, 53(3), 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.015
Clark, T. (2003). Disadvantages of collaborative online discussion and the advantages of sociability, fun and cliques for online learning BT - ICT and the teacher of the future Selected Papers from the International Federation for Information Processing Working Groups 3, 23, 23–25. http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV23Clark.pdf
Costello, P. A. (School of P. W. U. (2010). 26th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning. In Effective Assessment of Online Discussion Posts (pp. 1–5). Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research (Vol. 3).
Crow, G., & Wiles, R. (2008). Managing anonymity and confidentiality in social research: the case of visual data in Community research. Economic & Social Research Council, 8(8), 1–14.
Cyril, A. V. (2015). Time management and academic achievement of higher secondary Students. I-Manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 10(3), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.10.3.3129
Frykedal, F. K., & Hammar Chiriac, E. (2018). Student collaboration in group work: inclusion as participation. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 65(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2017.1363381
Gao, F., Wang, C. X., & Sun, Y. (2009). A new model of productive online discussion and its implications for research and instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), 65–78.
Hamdan, N. A., Mohamad, M., & Shaharuddin, S. (2017). Hypermedia reading materials: undergraduate perceptions and features affecting their reading comprehension. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(2), 116–125.
Harasim, L. (2014). Learning theory and online technologies. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning (Vol. 29). https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.864550
Haymon, C., & Wilson, A. (2020). Differentiated reading instruction with technology for advanced middle school students’ reading achievement. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(1), 70-89. https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2020.10.1.05
Hox, J. J., & Boeije, H. R. (2005). Data collection, primary vs. secondary. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00041-4
Islam, N., Beer, M., & Slack, F. (2015). E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 102–12. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i5.947
Kulikovskikh, I. M., Prokhorov, S. A., & Suchkova, S. A. (2017). Promoting collaborative learning through regulation of guessing in clickers. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.001
Qiyun, W., & Huay, L. W. (2007). Comparing asynchronous online discussions and face-to-face discussions in a classroom setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00621.x
Rahman, S., Yasin, R. M., & Jusoff, K. (2011). Knowledge construction process in Online Learning, 8(2), 488–492.
Rangaswamy, Manjunath G, & Sampath Kumar, B. T. (2017). Internet as a source of information: Usage among the faculty members and students. Library Waves, 3(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11574126
Raposo, A., Durão, A., Estradas, A., & Ribeiro, I. (2020). Technology as a tool to enhance motivation and learning. E3S Web of Conferences, 171, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017101011
Sawhney, M., & Prandelli, E. (2000). Communities of creation: managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. California Management Review, 42(4), 24–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166052
Stake, R. E. (2005). Case studies. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-SAGE-Handbook-Qualitative-Research/dp/0761927573
Tsai, M.-J., Liang, J.-C., Hou, H.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). University students’ online information searching strategies in different search contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 881–895. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.822
Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782485
Wang, P. A., & Member, S. (2015). Assessment of asynchronous online discussions for a constructive online learning. Community, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.575
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007
Wishart, C., & Guy, R. (2009). Analyzing responses, moves, and roles in online discussions- Grading rubrics for online discussions. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5, 129–144.
Xia, J. C., Fielder, J., & Siragusa, L. (2013). Achieving better peer interaction in online discussion forums: A reflective practitioner case study. Issues in Educational Research, 23(1), 97–113.
