WORKLOAD ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL RECORD PERSONNEL IN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD-BASED SERVICES

Authors

  • Nopita Cahyaningrum Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • Hesty Latifa Noor Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • Lilik Anggar Sri Rahayuningsih Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47701/eehmx644

Keywords:

workload analysis, electronic medical records, medical record personnel, staffing, hospital

Abstract

The transition from hybrid medical records to electronic
medical records changes the distribution of tasks and may
alter staffing needs in medical record services. This study
aimed to analyze the workload and staffing requirements of
medical record personnel in hybrid medical record services
during the transition to electronic medical records. A
descriptive quantitative workload data from the Medical
Record Installation of a hospital using a hybrid medical
record system during the transition to electronic medical
records. Available working time, activity time standards,
annual activity quantities, supporting-task factors, and
staffing availability were analyzed using the Health
Workload Analysis approach while retaining the hospital's
actual available working time. The available working time
was 112,320 minutes/year for five-day medical record
services and 119,280 minutes/year for the 24-hour
registration service. The calculated staffing requirements
were 1.02 personnel for distribution and data transfer, 1.46
for medicolegal services, 1.48 for inpatient coding and filing,
1.47 for assembling and reporting, and 9.03 for registration.
The unrounded total staffing requirement was 14.46
personnel. After rounding the staffing requirement at each
subunit, the operational staffing requirement was 16
personnel compared with 13 personnel currently available,
indicating a shortage of 3 personnel. The findings indicate a
workload–staffing gap, particularly in several medical
record subunits, and support periodic workforce
redistribution and staffing evaluation alongside the
transition toward electronic medical record
implementation.

References

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Regulation of the Minister of

Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2022 concerning Medical

Records. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia.

Budi, A. P. (2022). Perbandingan beban kerja tenaga rekam medis elektronik dan manual

menggunakan metode ABK Kesehatan. Jurnal Manajemen Informasi dan

Administrasi Kesehatan, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.32585/jmiak.v5i2.2831

Widiyanto, W. W. (2023). Perbandingan beban kerja tenaga rekam medis elektronik dan

manual di rumah sakit tipe C. Jenggala: Jurnal Riset Pengembangan dan Pelayanan

Kesehatan, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.56399/jgl.v1i2.53

Benson, M., Gopal, D., & Pfau, P. (2023). Electronic health record work demands for

gastroenterology and hepatology providers: A prospective use analysis and survey

study. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 68(4), 1218–1225.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07691-6

Shan, Y., et al. (2023). Workflow interruption and nurses' mental workload in electronic

health record tasks: An observational study. BMC Nursing.

Naamneh, R., & Bodas, M. (2024). The effect of electronic medical records on medication

errors, workload, and medical information availability among qualified nurses in

Israel: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing, 23, 270.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01936-7

Overhage, J. M., Qeadan, F., Choi, E. H. E., Vos, D., & Kroth, P. J. (2024). Explaining

variability in electronic health record effort in primary care ambulatory encounters.

Applied Clinical Informatics, 15(2), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-

1782228

Provenzano, M., Cillara, N., Curcio, F., Pisu, M. O., Avilés González, C. I., & Jiménez-

Herrera, M. F. (2024). Electronic health record adoption and its effects on healthcare

staff: A qualitative study of well-being and workplace stress. International Journal

of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(11), 1430.

Baymon, D. E., et al. (2024). Measuring emergency department workload perception using

electronic medical record measures of patient volume and acuity. Journal of

Emergency Medicine, 66(3), e374–e380.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.10.004

Kanaparthy, N. S., et al. (2025). Protected time for electronic health record work and

physician productivity. JAMA Network Open, 8(12), e2546550.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.46550

Collins, S. A., et al. (2022). Time spent by intensive care unit nurses on the electronic health

record. Critical Care Nurse. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2022518

Downloads

Published

2026-09-26