ANALISIS KOMPARASI KECEPATAN AKSES WEBSITE E-COMMERCE ANTARA ARSITEKTUR WEB HOSTING KONVENSIONAL DAN CLOUD SERVERLESS TERDISTRIBUSI
Keywords:
web hosting konvensional, cloud serverless, kecepatan akses, e-commerce, komparasi performa.Abstract
Perkembangan platform e-commerce yang pesat menuntut infrastruktur hosting yang mampu memberikan performa tinggi, respons cepat, dan ketersediaan layanan yang optimal. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dan membandingkan kecepatan akses website e-commerce antara dua arsitektur infrastruktur hosting, yaitu platform terkelola yang berjalan secara always-on (direpresentasikan oleh Railway) dan cloud serverless terdistribusi dengan edge network global (direpresentasikan oleh Vercel). Pengujian dilakukan menggunakan alat ukur performa web GTmetrix dan Google PageSpeed Insights, dengan parameter yang diukur mencakup Time to First Byte (TTFB), First Contentful Paint (FCP), dan Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) pada kondisi jaringan desktop dan mobile. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa arsitektur serverless unggul pada metrik TTFB dalam simulasi desktop, namun pada simulasi mobile dengan throttling jaringan Slow 4G, platform always-on justru mencatat skor performa dan LCP yang lebih baik, sehingga tidak satu arsitektur pun yang secara mutlak unggul di seluruh skenario pengujian. Pola perbedaan performa yang teramati konsisten dengan penjelasan pada literatur mengenai karakteristik cold start pada arsitektur serverless, meskipun pengukuran cold start secara eksplisit belum dilakukan dalam penelitian ini sehingga keterkaitan tersebut masih bersifat interpretatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pemilihan arsitektur hosting sebaiknya disesuaikan dengan karakteristik trafik, kebutuhan skalabilitas, dan anggaran operasional masing-masing platform e-commerce.
References
[2] Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII), “Survei Penetrasi Internet Indonesia 2024,” APJII, Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://apjii.or.id
[3] J. van Riet, I. Malavolta, and T. A. Ghaleb, “Optimise Along the Way: An Industrial Case Study on Web Performance,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 198, Article 111593, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111593
[4] S. Pati and Y. Zaki, “Evaluating the Efficacy of Next.js: A Comparative Analysis with React.js on Performance, SEO, and Global Network Equity,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.15707, Feb. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15707
[5] A. M. Sundjaja, A. V. Tatuil, D. V. Scholus, and Y. D. Restiani, “The Determinant Factors of Shopping Cart Abandonment Among E-commerce Customers in Indonesia,” CommIT (Communication and Information Technology) Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 29–38, Apr. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v18i1.9308
[6] E. B. Setiawan and A. Setiyadi, “Comparative Analysis of Web Hosting Server Performance,” International Journal of Engineering, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 558–564, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2023.36.03c.16
[7] J. Wen, Z. Chen, X. Jin, and X. Liu, “Rise of the Planet of Serverless Computing: A Systematic Review,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 32, no. 5, Article 131, Jul. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3579643
[8] M. Golec, G. K. Walia, M. Kumar, F. Cuadrado, S. S. Gill, and S. Uhlig, “Cold Start Latency in Serverless Computing: A Systematic Review, Taxonomy, and Future Directions,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 65:1–65:36, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3700875
[9] J. Abraham and J. Yang, “A Comparative Analysis of Performance and Usability on Serverless and Server-Based Google Cloud Services,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Advances in Computing Research (ACR’23), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, pp. 408–422, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33743-7_33
[10] M. Ghattas, S. Odeh, and A. M. Mora, “Predicting Website Performance: A Systematic Review of Metrics, Methods, and Research Gaps (2010–2024),” Computers, vol. 14, no. 10, Article 446, Oct. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14100446
[11] V. Fujiyanti, G. M. Suranegara, and I. N. Ichsan, “Comparative Analysis of Server-Based and Serverless Service Performance on Google Cloud Platform (GCP) (Case Study: Machine Learning Model Deployment),” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1172–1194, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v6i2.773
[12] M. A. Pratama, O. Nurdiawan, A. R. Dikananda, D. Pratama, and D. A. Kurnia, “Comparative Analysis of Serverless Container Service Performance Between Google Cloud Run and AWS App Runner in Cross-Cloud Architecture,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2531–2539, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://ioinformatic.org/index.php/JAIEA/article/view/1919
