Multi-center Study for Interprofessional Education in Community Settings to Develop Online Peer Assessment System

Authors

  • Doni Widyandana Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Fitriana Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Fitriana Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Fatikhu Yatuni Asmara Universitas Diponegoro
  • Tri Nur Kristina Universitas Diponegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47701/icohetech.v1i1.779

Keywords:

IPE, multi center, benefit and challenges, domain competencies

Abstract

Interprofessional Education (IPE) is becoming a worldwide trend to be applied to the education of health workers. IPE is believed to be able to prepare students to be more ready to collaborate with various health professions in the world of work later. However, the challenge of implementing an ideal education and assessment system is still being debated. Evaluate the education system and IPE assessment of multicenter (3 universities) in achieving 4 domains of IPE competency. Furthermore, the results are used as a base for recommendations to improve the education system and student assessment. Cross sectional study to evaluate education process and IPE assessment take part into three health institute centers. The institutions are a part of JOGLOSEMAR (Jogjakarta, Solo and Semarang City). Research intended to evaluate competence achievement on 4 IPE domains following IPEC 2016. A multicenter survey involved students (n= 500), focused group discussion with academic lecturer (n=10 and focused group discussion with student representatives (n=10) established to evaluate the education system and IPE assessment. A qualitative descriptive data analysis performed by 2 independent researchers. Multicenter survey indicate that students have receiving positive impact from the IPE program to achieve 4 designated competence. FGD shows that challenge for the program occurred from activity scheduling as it necessary to accommodate the whole professions participation. Besides, challenge also coming from the ability of academic lecturer to provide sufficient supervision, availability of learning resources e.g. guide book and assignments, transparent and reliable evaluation items and last distinct guideline of student activity and any kind of violation. IPE Program from 3 academic center shows similar result, indicating that the program provides positive result to achieve student competencies. Challenges among the students and academic lecturer require appropriate management in order to organize a responsible study activity.

References

Botma Y, Labuschagne M. Students’ perceptions of interprofessional education and collaborative practice: analysis of freehand drawings. J Interprof Care 2019;33:321–7. doi:10.1080/13561820.2019.1605981.

Mulyati L, Trimarliana M. Model Pendidikan Interprofesional Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Kolaboratif Mahasiswa Kesehatan 2017:1–11.

Riskiyana R, Claramita M, Rahayu GR. Objectively measured interprofessional education outcome and factors that enhance program effectiveness: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today 2018;66:73–8. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.014.

Nash WA, Hall LA, Ridner SL, Hayden D, May T, Firriolo J, et al. Evaluation of an interprofessional education program for advanced practice nursing and dental students : The oral-systemic health connection 2018;66:25–32. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.021.

Lennen N, Miller B. Introducing Interprofessional Education in Nursing Curricula. Teach Learn Nurs 2017;12:59–61. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2016.07.002.

Nabilou B, Feizi A, Seyedin H. Patient Safety in Medical Education: Students’ Perceptions, Knowledge and Attitudes. PLoS One 2015;10:e0135610. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135610.

Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: 2016 Update. Washington DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2016.

Dunbar SB, Otr L, Feldman HA, Nelson TM, Vargas P, Fritzinger-hearn L, et al. The Interprofessional Diabetes and Education Awareness ( IDEA ) community program. J Interprofessional Educ Pract 2017;7:75–7. doi:10.1016/j.xjep.2017.03.006.

Green BN, Johnson CD. Interprofessional collaboration in research, education, and clinical practice: working together for a better future 2015;29:1–10. doi:10.7899/JCE-14-36.

Lestari E, Stalmeijer RE, Widyandana D, Scherpbier A. Understanding students’ readiness for interprofessional learning in an Asian context: a mixed-methods study. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:179. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0704-3.

Nguyen Q, Tong M, Brennan H, Goodwin J, Gimeno T. Implementation of a student-led interprofessional education clinic at a safety net community health center. J Interprofessional Educ Pract 2018;11:74–9. doi:10.1016/j.xjep.2018.02.009.

Kelly L, Walters L, Rosenthal D. Community-based medical education: is success a result of meaningful personal learning experiences? Educ Health (Abingdon) 2014;27:47–50. doi:10.4103/1357-6283.134311.

Balasooriya C, Olupeliyawa A, Iqbal M, Lawley C, Cohn A, Ma D, et al. A student-led process to enhance the learning and teaching of teamwork skills in medicine. Educ Heal Chang Learn Pract 2013;26:78–84. doi:10.4103/1357-6283.120698.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-16