Challenges in The Academic Promotion Process: Perspectives From Faculty Members

Authors

  • Joni Maulindar University Kuala Lumpur
  • Zalizah Awang Long Univesiti Kuala Lumpur
  • Jawahir Che Mustapha University Kuala Lumpur
  • Singgih Purnomo Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47701/icohetech.v5i1.4127

Keywords:

lack of transparency in rules, policy changes, evaluation complexity, institutional support

Abstract

The academic promotion process faces various challenges that cause delays for faculty members in reaching higher ranks. This research aims to identify and analyze the factors contributing to delays in the academic promotion process. The research method used is a quantitative approach, with data collection techniques involving the distribution of questionnaires to faculty members who are currently undergoing or about to undergo the academic promotion process. The research results indicate that the lack of transparency in rules, policy changes, evaluation complexity, communication limitations, and institutional support all have a significant and equal impact on the challenges of academic promotion, with each factor having a coefficient of 0.2000. The R-squared and Adjusted R-squared values of 1.000 indicate that this model can explain the entire variation in academic promotion challenges. The high statistical significance of all coefficients suggests that these results are almost certainly not due to chance. Data analysis also shows that there is little autocorrelation in the model's residuals, and the residual distribution is nearly normal. These findings highlight the importance of transparency, policy consistency, effective communication, and institutional support in the academic promotion process. Improvements in these areas are expected to reduce the challenges faced by faculty members during the promotion process

References

Alperin, J. P., Mun˜, C. M., Nieves, M., Schimanski, L. A., Fischman, G. E., Niles, M. T., & Mckiernan, E. C. (2019). How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? 1–23. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42254.001

Bilal, A. R., Fatima, T., & Imran, M. K. (2020). Why ostracized full-time faculty should not be labeled as “low performer”? A qualitative insight from higher education in Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(5), 805–827. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2018-0267

Dasanayaka, C. H., Abeykoon, C., Ranaweera, R. A. A. S., & Koswatte, I. (2021). The impact of the performance appraisal process on job satisfaction of the academic staff in higher educational institutions. Education Sciences, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100623

Díez, F., Villa, A., López, A. L., & Iraurgi, I. (2020). Impact of quality management systems in the performance of educational centers: educational policies and management processes. In Heliyon (Vol. 6, Issue 4). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03824

Domingo, C. R., Gerber, N. C., Harris, D., Mamo, L., Pasion, S. G., Rebanal, R. D., & Rosser, S. V. (2022). More Service or More Advancement: Institutional Barriers to Academic Success for Women and Women of Color Faculty at a Large Public Comprehensive Minority-Serving State University. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 15(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000292

Griffith, A. S., & Altinay, Z. (2020). A framework to assess higher education faculty workload in U.S. universities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(6), 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1786432

Hart-Baldridge, E. (2020). Faculty Advisor Perspectives of Academic Advising. NACADA Journal, 40(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.12930/nacada-18-25

Hollywood, A., McCarthy, D., Spencely, C., & Winstone, N. (2020). ‘Overwhelmed at first’: the experience of career development in early career academics. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(7), 998–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1636213

Joshi, A., Vinay, M., & Bhaskar, P. (2020). Impact of coronavirus pandemic on the Indian education sector: perspectives of teachers on online teaching and assessments. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-06-2020-0087

Maican, C. I., Cazan, A. M., Lixandroiu, R. C., & Dovleac, L. (2019). A study on academic staff personality and technology acceptance: The case of communication and collaboration applications. Computers & Education, 128, 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2018.09.010

Midway, S. R. (2020). Principles of Effective Data Visualization. In Patterns (Vol. 1, Issue 9). Cell Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100141

Pham, D. H. (2021). The Professional Development of Academic Staff in Higher Education Institution. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0009

Sarkar, B., Omair, M., & Kim, N. (2020). A cooperative advertising collaboration policy in supply chain management under uncertain conditions. Applied Soft Computing, 88, 105948. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASOC.2019.105948

Szromek, A. R., & Wolniak, R. (2020). Job satisfaction and problems among academic staff in higher education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12124865

White-Lewis, D. K. (2020). The Facade of Fit in Faculty Search Processes. Journal of Higher Education, 833–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1775058

Young, S. N., Vanwye, W. R., Schafer, M. A., Robertson, T. A., & Poore, A. V. (2019). Factors Affecting PhD Student Success. In International Journal of Exercise Science (Vol. 12, Issue 1). http://www.intjexersci.com

Downloads

Published

2024-09-24