LEGAL PROTECTION FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME ACTIONS OF ILLEGAL ACCESS TO PERSONAL INFORMATION

Authors

  • Rina Arum Prastyanti Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • S. Andi Sutrasno Soerjo Ngawi University
  • Devy Setyani Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47701/icohetech.v1i1.1159

Keywords:

phising, bank services, cybercrime

Abstract

Illegal access crimes continue to increase from year to year. Accessing information belonging to other people is a violation of human rights, so a legal study is needed to measure how well the Indonesian government is in protecting the interests of its citizens. Especially in the field of technology and information through regulations or government decisions and judges. The objectives to be achieved in this research are:  To find out the position of victims of crime in accessing personal information illegally in the Criminal Law justice system. To find out the form of legal protection for victims of crime to access personal information illegally. In this study, the research method used is juridical or normative research methods. This research method uses research on existing library materials to solve problems. The approach method used in this research is to use the statutory regulatory approach. In this study using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials: 1. Primary legal materials are materials that have juridical binding power, such as statutory regulations, court decisions, and agreements. The legal materials used include the Criminal Code. 2. Secondary legal materials are materials that do not have juridical binding power, namely draft laws and regulations, literature, and journals related to the focus of research. Techniques Analysis of the legal materials used in this research is qualitative data analysis including data classification activities in accordance with legal issues and provisions, then editing, presenting the results of the analysis in narrative form, and drawing conclusions. The position of a crime victim in accessing personal information illegally in the Criminal Procedure Code is only as a witness in a criminal case where the victim can only prove the suspect / defendant's guilt. Because in a criminal justice process, the witness (victim) plays a very important role in the effort to reveal a material truth. Legal protection for victims of crime from accessing personal information illegally as part of legal protection to the public, can be manifested in various forms, such as compensation, restitution and compensation. And adhering to the provisions of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions and the Criminal Code.

References

Achmad Nosi Utama, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, Putwoti, 2016. Diponegoro Law Review Vol 5 No 2.

Adami Chazawi. 2002. SH.Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Arif, Gosita, 1993, Masalah Korban Kejahatan, Akademika Pressindo. Jakarta.

Chaerudin dan Syarif Fadillah, Korban Kejahahatan dalam Prespektif Viktimologi & Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta : Grhadhika Press.

Dheny Wahyudi. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan Cyber Crime Di Indonesia” dalam Jurnal Hukum Jambi

Hans Kelsen, 2011. General Theory of Law and State, diterjemahkan oleh Rasisul Muttaqien, Bandung : Nusa Media.

Hyronimus Rhiti, 2015. Filsafat Hukum Edisi Lengkap (Dari Klasik ke Postmodernisme), Ctk. Kelima, Yogyakarta : Universitas Atma Jaya

J. E Sahetapy, 1987. Viktimologi Sebuah Bunga Rampai, cetakan 1. Jakarta : Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

John Rawls, 2006. A Theory of Justice, London: Oxford University press, diterjemahkan dalam Bahasa Indonesia oleh Uzair Fauzan dan Heru Prasetyo, Teori Keadilan. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Yogyakarta.

Josua Sitompul, 2012. Cyberspace, cybercrime, cyberlaw, Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Tatanusa.

Kahar Masyhur, 1985. Membina Moral dan Akhlak. Jakarta : Kalam Mulia.

Tim Penyusun kamus Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, 1991, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Edisi Kedua, Cet. 1. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.

Kancil CST, 1989, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Leden Marpaung, 2008. Asas-Toeri-Praktek Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

M. Agus Santoso, 2014. Hukum,Moral & Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum, Ctk. Kedua. Jakarta : Kencana.

Moeljatno, 1993. Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggung Jawabannya Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta : Rinneke Cipta

Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution, 2017. Hukum dalam Pendekatan Filsafat, Ctk. Kedua. Jakarta : Kencana.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arif, 1998, Teori-teori dan Kejahatan Pidana, Alumni. Bandung.

Pan Mohamad Faiz, 2009. Teori Keadilan John Rawls, dalam Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 6 Nomor 1

Phillipus M. Hadjon, 1987. Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu.

Satjipto Rahardjo, 2014. Ilmu Hukum, Ctk. Kedelapan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Soeparmono, R, 2003. Praperadilan dan Penggabungan Perkara Ganti Kerugian dalam KUHAP. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Soerjono Soekanto, Sri Mamudji, 1985. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Tongat, 2009. Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan, Malang: UMM Press

Downloads

Published

2021-04-06