Identification of Beef Freshness Using Smart Labels Based On Anthocyanin Extract of Purple Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea Var. Capitata L.)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47701/icohetech.v1i1.1147Keywords:
Freshness, Beef, Purple Cabbage, Anthocyanin, Smart labelsAbstract
Technological developments ensure food quality and food safety when the Covid-19 pandemic in innovation and application develop rapidly. This is related to food safety which prioritizes body health. Beef is a source of animal protein that is needed to complete nutritional needs to maintain body health and immunity. Beef is a food material that is susceptible to damage due to microbiological and chemical activities. In general, people can only assess the quality and freshness of beef by conducting a sensory evaluation, namely the visual, smell, and texture processes. Sensory evaluations tend to be subjective in nature which is accepted by human reason. It is very ineffective to be used as the same parameter by everyone. Moreover, in support of new habit patterns, there must be renewable technology that can help to reduce direct contact between people being marketed. So we need indicators that can answer the freshness of local beef which is more practical and can facilitate all levels of society. The smart label based on purple cabbage anthocyanin can be a product that helps people see the freshness of beef very easily. Several previous studies have stated that anthocyanins in fruits and vegetables can be a natural indicator that can harm the volatile gases present in meat during the storage process. Purple cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) is known to have a very high anthocyanin content. Besides that, the color density produced by purple cabbage makes it possible to support smart labels. In this study, the extraction of purple cabbage anthocyanin by maceration method used two different types of solvents, namely 96% methanol acidified with 1% HCl and 95% ethanol which was acidified with 3% Citric Acid so that the best total content of purple cabbage anthocyanin was 87,324 mg / 100g with a pH of 5.4. Smart labels are made into edible films with a mixture of chitosan, polyvinyl alcohol, and CMC. The parameters of the freshness level of the meat are based on the pH and Total Microbial tests on beef. From these parameters, changes in smart labels are avoided so that it can change changes in the quality of meat in packaging. Fresh beef has a pH ranging from 6.7 - 7.2 then will experience a decrease in pH to 5.4 - 5.5 (ultimate pH of beef) and then beef tends to increase in pH (spoilage process). In this pH range, it can be divided into three types of groups of smart label indicator color change which results in grouping data on meat products, namely fresh, still fresh, and not fresh.
References
Sonneveld, K. “What drives (food) packaging innovation? Packaging Technology and Science ”, 2000. 13 (1): 29-35
Gunawan, Lia. "Comparative Analysis of the Physical Quality of Imported Beef and Local Beef". Journal of Hospitality and Service Management. 1 (1): 22-26. 2013.
Merthayasa et al. Merthayasa, J. S., I. K. Suada, & K. K. Agustina. 2015. "Water binding capacity, pH, color, smell and texture of Bali beef and Wagyu beef". Indonesia Medicus Veterinus 4 (1): 16-24. 2015.
Soeparno. Meat Science and Technology. Second edition. Yogyakarta. Gadjah Mada University Press, 2015.
Wu, T.H & Bechtel, P.J. Salmon by-product storage and oil extraction. Food Chemistry, 111, 868-871. 2008.
Primapack, 2011 Primapack. Smart Packaging (Active and Intelligent Packaging). Packaging Science & Applied Technique Packaging Bulletin. Primapack Company. 2011.
Ananta R., Samuel B.W., Harjono. "Films Based on Purple Sweet Potato Anthocyanin Extract as Bioindicator of Damage to Chicken Meat". Indonesian Journal of Chemical Science 6 (1): 84 -90. 2017.
Ahmadiani, N., Robbins, R.J., Collins, T.M., & Giusti, M. M. "Anthocyanins Contents, Profiles, and Color Characteristics of Red Cabbage Extracts from Different Cultivar and Maturity Stages". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 6 (2): 7524 –753, 2014
Suradi, K. "The Effect of Storage Time at Room Temperature on Changes in pH, TVB and Total Bacteria of Buffalo Meat." Journal of Animal Science 12 (2): 9-1, 2012.
AOAC. "Total Monomeric Anthocyanin Pigment Content of Fruit Juice, Beverages, Natural Colorants and Wines pH Differential Method". 2005.
Kurniawan, N.P., Septinova, D., Adhianto, K. "Physical Quality of Beef from Slaughterhouses in Bandar Lampung." Integrated Animal Husbandry Scientific Journal 2 (3): 133 - 137.2014.
National Standardization Agency (SNI 2897: 2008) Testing Methods for Microbial Contamination in Meat, Eggs and Milk, and Their Processed Products. National Standardization Agency. Accessed from: http://standarpangan.pom.go.id/dokumen/peraturan/2016/PerKa_BPOM_No_16_Tahun_2016_tentang_Kriteria_Mikrobiologi_dalam_Pangan_Olahan.pdf. 2008.
Marliana, Herci. Optimization of Reagents (Schryver) to Become Indicator Paper for Formalin Identification in Food Samples. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Indonesia, Depok [Thesis], 2008.
Budiarto, E. "Biostatistics for Medicine and Public Health." Jakarta: Medical Book Publisher Egc. 2001.
Phaza, et al. Effect of Ethanol Concentration, Temperature and Number of Stage on Batch Extraction of Ginger (Zingiber Officinale Rose). Semarang: Final Project of Chemical Engineering UNDIP. 2010.
Kusuma R.B., Enis K, Siti M., Anjang B.P., Kamaluddin M. Digital Image Analysis as a Color Characterization and Quantification Method in Ornamental Fish. Journal of Ris. Aquaculture 6 (3): 381-392, 2011.
Hurriyah (2017) Hurriyah R.A.R.Z., Bambang K., Dwi K.P. Development of Bromphenol Blue and Bromtimol Blue on Smart Label Dragon Fruit Maturity Sensor. E-Journal of Health Literature 5 (3): 406 412, 2017.
