THE EVALUATING MACHINE SAFETY AND SUSTAINABILITY BY CIRCULAR DESIGN: A COMPOSITE INDICATOR

Authors

  • Febrina Agusti Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • Ringgi Ismoyo Buwono Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • Fertilio Dwyanton Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • Damara Jibran Novianto Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47701/zq8bey93

Keywords:

Machine, Safety, Sustainability, Design, Indicator

Abstract

Circular design offers significant potential for creating more environmentally friendly and sustainable machines. However, its implementation also presents a number of challenges, particularly related to operational safety and sustainability evaluation. A comprehensive evaluation approach and clear technical standards are needed to ensure that circularly designed machines remain efficient, safe, and suitable for long-term use. This research method uses a literature review to develop indicators. The results of this article identify 16 indicators that can be used to develop sustainable machine designs. These indicators are divided into two main categories: 8 indicators related to environmental aspects, including energy savings, recycling, reuse, toxic and hazardous materials, number of components, product durability, and environmentally friendly components; and 9 indicators related to technical aspects, including assembly and disassembly, product dimensions, product weight, maintenance, safety of use, ease of operation, ease of cleaning, ease of production, and product adaptability. Furthermore, indicator validation is crucial to ensure that the indicators used are relevant, accurate, and reliable in the context of developing sustainable machine designs.

References

Agusti, F., Buwono, R., Dwyanton, F., & Wahyono, A. (2025). Multi Criteria Decision Making for the Preparation of Sustainability Indicators for the Printing Sector Industry. Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, 5(1), 1-16.

Agusti, F., Wisudawati, T., Risqi, F., & Kumaratunggadewi, K. (2022). Evaluasi Teknologi Produksi pada Sentra Industri Keripik Tempe Grobog Wonogiri. Jurnal Duta Abdimas, 1(2).

Andriani, D., Choiri, M., & Desrianto, D. (2018). Redesain Produk Berfokus Pada Customers Requirement Dengan Integrasi Axiomatic Design dan House of Quality. JITI: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 17(1), 71-82.

Arkouli, Z., Michalos, G., Kokotinis, G., & Markis, S. (2024). Worker-centered Evaluation and Redesign of Manufacturing Task For Ergonomic Improvement Using Axiomatic Design Principles. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 55, 188-209.

Dreier, J., PerauS, Hoepfner, G., Berroth, J., Riesener, M., Keuper, A., Jacobs, G. (2025). A framework for assessing and enhancing product circularity by translating . Sustainable Production and Consumption, 58, 75-90.

Falsafi, A., Togiani, A., Colley, A., & Varis, J. (2025). Life cycle assessment in circular design process: A systematic . Journal of Cleaner Production, 521(146188), 1-21.

Farid, A., & Suh, N. (2016). Axiomatic Design in Large Systems. Switzerland: Spinger.

Fazeli, H., & Peng, Q. (2022). Generation and evaluation of product concepts by integrating extended axiomatic design, quality function deployment and design structure matrix. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 54(101716). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101716

Feng, J., & Chen, F. (2025). A Recycling Mechanism For Used Electric Vehicle Batteries By Integrating Affine Maximizer Auction and Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Method. ENERGY, 334(137822).

Khalid, M., & Mola, G. (2025). Developing a framework for integration of a green supply chain at energy production using fuzzy-QFD. Journal of Engineering Research.

Kittichotsatsawat, Y., Auch, E., & Tippayawong, K. (2024). Designing Sustainability Measurement of a Thai Coffe Supply Chain Using Axiomatic Design and Business Model Canvas. Results in Engineering, 24(103443), 1-17.

Lapinskiene, V., & Motuziene, V. (2021). Integrated building design technology based on quality function deployment and axiomatic design methods: A case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 65(102631). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102631

Li, X., & Li, H. (2024). Age-appropriate design of domestic intelligent medical products: An example of smart blood glucose detector for the elderly with AHP-QFD Joint KE. Heliyon, 10(e27387).

Liu, Q., Chen, J., Yang, K., Liu, D., He, L., Qin, Q., & Wang, Y. (2023). An integrating spherical fuzzy AHP and axiomatic design approach and its application in human–machine interface design evaluation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

Otto, K., & Wood, K. (2001). Product Design Techniques in Reverese Engineering and New Product Development. New Jersy: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Renjith, S., Kreme, G., & Park, K. (2018). A design framework for additive manufacturing through the synergistic use of axiomatic design theory and triz. Proceding of th 2018 IISE Annual Conference.

Sarpong, N., Akowuah, J., Amoah, E., & Darko, J. (2024). Enhancing cassava grater design: A customer-driven approach using AHP, QFD, and TRIZ integration. Heliyon, 10(e36167), 1-17.

Verma, A., Maiti, J., & Boustras, G. (2020). Analysis of categorical incident data and design for safety interventions using axiomatic design framework. Safety Science.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-25