The Concept Of Justice In Maternal And Child Health Care Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47701/ijlle.v6i1.4911Keywords:
Healthcare Disparities, Justice as Fairness, Maternal and Child HealthcareAbstract
Despite improvements in maternal and child healthcare (MCH) outcomes in Indonesia, significant disparities persist, particularly in remote and underdeveloped areas. This study examines the concept of justice in MCH services, focusing on how justice is perceived and experienced by women in these regions. The study aims to explore how justice is applied in MCH services, focusing on equitable access, quality of care, and the inclusion of marginalized groups, particularly women from disadvantaged communities. A descriptive qualitative approach was used, relying on secondary legal materials, including academic journals, health policies, and regulations. Data were analyzed through content analysis to explore how justice principles, especially distributive justice, are reflected in MCH services. Findings show that justice in MCH services encompasses both equal access and preferential treatment for those in greater need. Rawls' Theory of Justice as Fairness provides a framework for understanding how policies should reduce healthcare inequalities and ensure equal opportunities for vulnerable populations. The study emphasizes the need for policies that prioritize the most disadvantaged groups, such as impoverished mothers and children, ensuring that justice in healthcare is both normative and actionable.
References
Braveman, P., & Gruskin, S. (2003). Defining equity in health. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(4), 254–258.
Daniels, N. (2008). Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge University Press.
George, A. S., Branchini, C., & Portela, A. (2018). Do interventions that promote awareness of rights increase use of maternity care services? A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0205958.
Gruskin, S., Mills, E. J., & Tarantola, D. (2007). History, principles, and practice of health and human rights. The Lancet, 370(9585), 449–455.
Hatt, L. E., Makinen, M., Madhavan, S., Conlon, C. M., & Larson, W. M. (2013). Effects of user fee exemptions on maternal health services: A review of literature. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 31(4), 67–80.
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2021. Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Informasi.
Koblinsky, M., Moyer, C. A., Calvert, C., Campbell, J., Campbell, O. M., Feigl, A. B., ... & Langer, A. (2016). Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action. The Lancet, 388(10057), 2307–2320.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (Revised ed.). Harvard University Press.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
World Health Organization. (2020). Improving maternal and newborn health and survival and reducing stillbirth: Strategic directions 2021–2025. WHO.
Yamin, A. E., & Boulanger, V. M. (2014). Why global goals and indicators matter: The experience of sexual and reproductive health and rights in the Millennium Development Goals. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(2-3), 218–231.
Yamin, A. E. (2005). The right to health as a human right in international law. Human Rights Quarterly, 21(4), 1200–1230.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sukendar, Bambang Sunaryo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
