Correlation Between Reselection Rule Main Diagnosis and Accuracy Code
PDF

Keywords

diagnosis code
Accuracy
medical information

Abstract

The diagnosis code has a very important role in making policies for health care providers. This study is an analytical study with a cross sectional approach. The method used is observation, interview and check list. The study sample was 81 out of 431 inpatient medical record documents. and sampling technique with systematic random sampling from. Data analysis uses univariate and bivariate with Fisher's.

The percentage of accuracy of reselection rules shows 64% accuracy (52 documents) and inaccurate is 36% (29 documents). The percentage of accuracy of reselection rules is 69 documents with a percentage of 85% and 12 documents incorrect with a percentage of 15%. The results of the Fisher's statistical calculation show no corelation to the primary diagnosis based on reselection rules with the accuracy of the diagnosis code based on ICD-10 (p = 0.529).

PDF

References

Arifianto, E.; Kresnowati, L.; Ernawati, D.;, “Keakuratan Kode Diagnosa Utama Dokumen Rekam Medis Pada Kasus Partus Dengan Sectio Cesarean di Rumah Sakit Panti Wilasa Citarum”. Jurnal Visi Kesehatan, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 84-88, 2011.

Bowman, E, & Abdelhak, Mervat. (2001). Coding, classification, and reimbursement systems. Health information: management of a strategic resource. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 229-258.

Campbell, S. E., et al. (2001). "A systematic review of discharge coding accuracy." Journal of Public Health 23(3): 205-211. Dimick, Chris. (2010). Achieving Coding Consistency. Journal of AHIMA, 81. No. 7.

Dahlan, M. S. 2012. Statistik Untuk Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Rekam Medis Rumah Sakit di Indonesia, Revisi II. Jakarta: Departemen Kesehatan RI Direktorat Jendral Bina Pelayanan Medik Departemen Kesehatan RI. 2006. Pedoman Penyelenggaraan dan Prosedur

Farzandipour, M.; Sheikhtaheri, A.; Sadoughi, F.;, “Effective Factors on Accuracy of Principal Diagnosis Coding Based on International Classification of Diseases, the 10th Revision (ICD-10)”, International Journal of Information Management, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 78–84, 2010.

Hatta, G.;, “Pedoman Manajemen Informasi Kesehatan di Sarana Pelayanan Kesehatan”, Universitas Indonesia Press, pp. 53-55, 2013.

Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia 2016. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 76 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pedoman INA-CBGs. Jakarta

Prasetyo, A; “Hubungan kelengkapan informasi medis dengan keakuratan kode diagnosis kasus gastroenteritis pasien rawat inap di Rumah Sakit PKU Muhammadiyah Karanganyar, Vol 3 tahun 2016

Rekam Medis Rumah Sakit di Indonesia (Revisi II). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Biona Pelayanan Medik.

Setianto, D W, 2012. Tinjauan keakuratan penetapan kode diagnosis utama berdasarkan spesifikasi penulisan diagnosis utama pada dokumen rekam medis rawat inap di rumah sakit permata medika semarang : Semarang : Universitas Udinus

Silfen, E. . Documentation and Coding of ED Patient Encounters: An Evaluation of the Accuracy of an Electronic Medical Record. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 24, no. 6 (2006): 664–678.

World Health Organization, “International Satistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems Tenth Revision volume 1, 2 dan 3”, Geneva, 2010