HEURISTIC EVALUATION ANALYSIS USING THE 10 NIELSEN RULE USABILITY METHOD ON THE KAI ACCESS APPLICATION

Authors

  • Muhammad Syarqim Mahfudz Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • Febrina Agusti Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • Sefa Az Zahra Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • Berliana Rahma Dhini Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47701/icohetech.v3i1.2154

Keywords:

KAI Access, 10 Nielsen’s Rule Usability

Abstract

KAI Access is the official application owned by PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) for ticket cancellations, changing ticket schedules, purchasing local trains, purchasing train tickets 1 hour before departure, e-boarding passes. Based on the user rating on the Play store, which is 3.3 out of 5 stars. In this study using 10 Nielsen's usability rules, with the aim of analyzing whether the KAI Access application can be said to be good or not. Task Analysis which is classified as efficient enough because the value of the lost ness level is only 0.26651869414146. It was found that from 6 of 10 Jacob Nielsen heuristic evaluations, errors were found to minimize the users memory load, feedback, shortcuts, prevent errors, help and documentation, consistency. The 10 principles of usability that need to be improved in this KAI Access application are the Minimize the users memory load type and the Minimize the users memory load type with the same severity rating 3, namely major with a fixed rating of 2, requiring some effort to fix.

References

Aziza, R. F. A. (2019) “Analisa Usability Desain User Interface Pada Website Tokopedia Menggunakan Metode Heuristics Evaluation,” Jurnal Tekno Kompak, 13(1), p. 7. doi: 10.33365/jtk.v13i1.265.

Dewi, I. K., Mursityo, Y. T. and Mardi, R. R. P. (2018) “Analisis Usability Aplikasi Mobile Pemesanan Layanan Taksi Perdana Menggunakan Metode Webuse dan Heuristic Evaluation,” Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (J-PTIIK) Universitas Brawijaya, 2(8), pp. 2909–2918.

Fatihahsari, F. and Darujati, C. (2021) “Analisis Usability Mobile Apps Edlink dengan Menggunakan Heuristic Evaluation,” Sistemasi, 10(2), p. 404. doi: 10.32520/stmsi.v10i2.1263.

Hadi, K. R., Az-zahra, H. M. and Fanani, L. (2018) “Analisis Dan Perbaikan Usability Aplikasi Mobile KAI Access Dengan Metode Usability Testing Dan Use Questionnaire,” Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 2(9), p. 2743.

Hadihardaja, J. (1997) “Sistem Transportasi.” Jakarta: Gunadarma.

ISO (1998) “Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminal (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on usability. Electronic documents.”

Nielsen, J. (2012) Usability 101: Introduction to Usability. Available at: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/ (Accessed: August 15, 2022).

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1985) “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing, 49(4), p. 41. doi: 10.2307/1251430.

Putra, A. R., Wijoyo, S. H. and Mursityo, Y. T. (2020) “Evaluasi Usability Dan Perbaikan User Interface Pada Aplikasi KRL Access Menggunakan Metode Human Centered Design ( HCD ) dan Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire ( PSSUQ ),” Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 4(1), p. 964X.

Saputra, A. (2019) “Penerapan Usability pada Aplikasi PENTAS Dengan Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale (SUS),” JTIM : Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia, 1(3), pp. 206–212. doi: 10.35746/jtim.v1i3.50.

Tjiptono, F. and G. C. (2011) Service, Quality & Satisfaction. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-17